THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO THE DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF A MINING ENTERPRISE
https://doi.org/10.57070/2304-4497-2023-1(43)-116-125
Abstract
The problem of sustainable development is becoming more and more urgent and paramount, it carries the basis of all economic policy. In 1987, the Chairman of the International Commission on Environment and Development for the first time identified a type of development that takes into account not only the interests of the social sphere, but also the environment (ecology). The concept of sustainable development was a response of the stakeholders of large enterprises to the increasing environmental problems against the background of economic growth and an attempt to solve the problem of forming a new model of human civilization development. The main task of sustainable development is to satisfy human needs and aspirations, to ensure the development of the present generation without prejudice to the interests of the future. To date, there has not been a single interpretation of sustainable development as a specific term. Foreign and Russian researchers in each of their work find different relationships and factors of influence, with the help of which it would be possible to determine a universal interpretation of sustainable development for widespread use. In the study of various approaches to the definition of sustainable development of enterprises, it was found that this concept must be considered from the point of view of efficiency for all functional areas of its activities, while taking into account the interests of society, the economy and the environment as a whole. Special attention is paid to the sustainable development of the mining industry (a large-scale branch of the world economy). The specific features of the mining company's production activities determine the importance of following the Concept of the Transition of the Russian Federation to Sustainable Development. Based on the reflected principles of sustainable development of the mining enterprise, the main parameters and characteristics necessary to clarify the definition of sustainable development of the enterprise of the relevant industry were identified. The results of the study expand and supplement the known knowledge about theoretical approaches to the definition of the category under study.
About the Authors
Natalia PerekrestRussian Federation
Postgraduate Student of the Department of Management and Industry Economics
Oleg Zatepyakin
Dr. Sci., Prof., Head of the Department of the Department of Management and Branch Economics
References
1. Brutland G.H. Our common future. Report of the UN Commission on Environment and Development. Moscow: Progress, 1987, 412 p. (In Russ.).
2. Merzlikina G.S. Economic viability of production systems. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1997, 160 p. (In Russ.).
3. Fedotova M.A. How to assess the financial stability of an enterprise. Finansy. 1995, no. 6, pp.13–16. (In Russ.).
4. Uskova T.V. Management of sustainable development of the region. Vologda: ISERT RAS, 2009. 355 p. (In Russ.).
5. Lavrushin D.B. Management of sustainable development of the enterprise. On the materials of machine-building enterprises. Avtoref. cand. diss. rab. Saratov: SGSEU, 1999. 18 p. (In Russ.).
6. Chuprov S.V. Diagnostics of industrial enterprise stability: system-methodological problems and approaches. (Sustainability management of production systems). Irkutsk: BSUEP, 2004, 282 p. (In Russ.).
7. Litvinenko I.A. Economic stability of corporate economic systems in Russia. Avtoref. cand. diss. rab. Moscow: RAGS, 1996, 24 p. (In Russ.).
8. Mozgovaya E.S. Formation of the potential for sustainable development of the fuel and energy complex. Vestnik SGSEU. 2009, № 4 (28), pp.125–128.
9. Koryakov A.G. Management of sustainable development of an industrial enterprise: theory, methodology, practice. Avtoref. Doc. rab. Moscow, 2012, 44 p. (In Russ.).
10. Bolshakov, B.E., Kuznetsov O.L., Kuznetsov P.G. Sustainable development: scientific foundations of design in the system nature–society–man (textbook of the XXI century). Moscow, 2002, 616 p. (In Russ.).
11. Khomyachenkova N.A. Mechanism of integral assessment of sustainability of industrial enterprises. Extended abstract of candidate`s thesis. Moscow, 2011, 21 p. (In Russ.).
12. Taburchak, P.P., Mikitas M.A. The mechanism of sustainable development of an enterprise with the use of its organizational potential. Management of economic systems: an electronic scientific journal. 2012, no. 4 (40), pp. 26–33. (In Russ.).
13. Raisberg B.A. Market economy. Moscow: Delovaya zhizn', 1993, 192 p. (In Russ.).
14. Sheremet A.D., Saifulin R.S. Methodology of financial analysis. Moscow: INFRA-M, 1995, 172 p. (In Russ.).
15. Sevastyanov A.V. Methods and mechanisms of management of integration processes in industry. Moscow: Delo LTD , 2004, 243 p. (In Russ.).
16. Каспиров А.В. Management of sustainable development of an industrial enterprise. Avtoref. cand. diss. rab. Saratov: SGSEU, 2001, 21 p. (In Russ.).
17. Roshchin V.I. Economic stability of enterprises and realization of their economic interests. Avtoref. cand. diss. rab. Cheboksary, 2000, 18 p. (In Russ.).
18. Levashov V.K. Sustainable development of society: paradigm, models, strategy. Moscow: Academia, 2001. 174 p. (In Russ.).
19. Zhurova L.I.., Toporkov M. A. Analysis of approaches to sustainable development of integrated corporate systems. Vestnik VUiT. 2015, no. 1 (33), pp. 17–24. (In Russ.).
20. Sidorov V.M. Assessment of the sustainable development of an enterprise with the help of an organizational and economic mechanism. Voprosy regional'noj ekonomiki. 2013, no. 1 (14), pp. 59–62. (In Russ.).
21. Volkova E.S., Nevidimova O.G. Sustainability in nature and society: a system-synergetic approach. Vestnik TGU. 2008, no. 317, pp. 258–263. (In Russ.).
22. Kutsenko E.I. Organizational and economic mechanism of sustainable development of the region. Orenburg: Liters, 2017, 224 p. (In Russ.).
23. Alferova T.V., Tretyakova E.A. Conceptual modeling of the definition of the category "sustainable development". Ekonomicheskaya teoriya. 2012, no. 4, pp. 46–52. (In Russ.).
24. Kuvshinov M.A. The concept of management of sustainable development of the socio-economic system of municipal education. Molodoj uchenyj. 2011, vol. 1, no. 7 (30), pp. 86–91. (In Russ.).
25. Kolosova T.V. Ensuring the sustainable development of an enterprise based on increasing its innovative potential. Avtoref. cand. diss. rab. Nizhny Novgorod, 2011, 44 p. (In Russ.).
26. Brian L. Connelly, David J. Ketchen Jr., Stanley F. Slater Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2011, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 86–100.
27. Rinne J., Lyytimäki J., Kautto P. From sustainability to wellbeing: Lessons learned from the use of sustainable development indicators at national and EU level. Ecological Indicators. 2013, vol. 35, p. 35–42.
28. Todorova V., Marinova D. Modelling sustainability. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 2011, vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 1397–1408.
29. Vallancea S., Perkins H.C., Dixonb J.E. What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum. 2011, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 342–348.
30. Happaerts Sander Sustainable development between international and domestic forces. A comparative analysis of subnational policies. Leuven International and European Studies (LINES) Leuven International and European Studies (LINES) HIVA – Research Institute for Work and Society. Available at URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/ 322654.
31. Pülzl H., Prokofieva I., Berg S., Rametsteiner E., Aggestam F., Wolfslehner B. Indicator development in sustainability impact assessment: balancing theory and practice. European Journal of Forest Research. 2012, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 35–46.
32. Nuno Quental, Júlia M. Lourenço, Fernando Nunes da Silva. Sustainable development policy: goals, targets and political cycles. Sustainable Development. 2011, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 15–29.
33. Tvaronavičienė, Manuela, Lankauskienė, Toma Plausible foreign direct investment' impact on sustainable development indicators of differently developed countries. Journal of Security & Sustainability. 2011, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–38.
34. Wolfgang Gerstlberger, Mette Præst Knudsen, Ian Stampe. Sustainable Development Strategies for Product Innovation and Energy Efficiency. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2013, pp. 87–92.
35. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 440 dated 01.04.1996 "The concept of transition of the Russian Federation to sustainable development". URL: http://government.ru/docs/all/ 17992/. (In Russ.).
36. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1225-r dated 31.08.2002 "On Approval of the Environmental Doctrine of the Russian Federation". URL: http:// government.ru/docs/all/43014/ (In Russ.).
37. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Vectors of achieving a sustainable future. Filosofskie nauki. 2017, no 7, pp. 139–149. (In Russ.).
38. Trubetskoy K.N., Galchenko Yu.P. Geoecology of subsurface development and ecogeotechnology of field development. Moscow: OOO «Nauchtekhlitizdat»; 2015, 360 p.
Review
For citations:
Perekrest N., Zatepyakin O. THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO THE DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF A MINING ENTERPRISE. Bulletin of the Siberian State Industrial University. 2023;(1):116-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.57070/2304-4497-2023-1(43)-116-125