Preview

Bulletin of the Siberian State Industrial University

Advanced search

DOME SURFACE AS AN ENERGY EFFICIENCY ELEMENT ENCLOSING STRUCTURES

Abstract

Among spatial structures, a special place is occupied by domed structures or cupolas. These are some of the most ancient spatial roofing systems. The first attempts to create curved roofs - domes - were made in Ancient Rome. Such roofs were used in Mesopotamia, Syria, Iran. The main materials of natural origin used for the construction of domes were stone and wood. However, the span covered by the dome was smaller than now, and the shell was thicker. Until recently, domes were mainly used as an option for completing a religious building, but with the advent of new materials (reinforced concrete, various plastics), as well as the competent use of long-known materials such as wood or stone, domed structures are gaining popularity. In the twentieth century, significant contributions to the construction and use of dome structures were made by Lederer, Makovsky, Otto Wright, Buckminster Fuller, M.S. Tupolev, M.E. Lipnitsky, V.A. Savelyev.

About the Authors

Е.I. Popova
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation


N.N. Baschenko
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation


A.I. Sorvachev
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation


O.D. Chuprina
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation


References

1. Ryabukhina S.A. Stone vaulted

2. structures: history, classification, application

3. // SUSIS. 2015. No. 6 (33). pp. 87-97.

4. Tur V.I. Dome structures:

5. form formation, calculation,

6. design, efficiency improvement. Moscow: DIA, 2004. 96 p

7. . 3. Zimin S.S., Bespalov V.V., Kokotkova O.D.

8. Vaulted structures

9. of historical buildings // SUSIS. 2015. No. 2 (29). pp. 57-72.

10. Sylvester Kobelyak, Zenon Zamiar.

11. Oval concrete domes // Archive of Civil Engineering and

12. Mechanical Engineering. 2017. Volume 17. Issue 3. pp.

13. – 501.

14. Free Robert M. Geodesic domes as

15. the most effective construction

16. systems // Construction and real estate

17. [electronic resource]. – Access mode:

18. http://www.nestor.minsk.by/sn/1997/31/sn310

19. htm . (Accessed 05/10/2017).

20. Jin-Harn Lim, Michael Barry Hearning, Nila

21. Keumala, Norafida Ab. Gafar.

22. Daylight efficiency and visual assessment by users of green

23. building offices in Malaysia // Energy and

24. Building. 2017. Volume 141. pp. 175 – 185.

25. Qingbin Song, Li Jinhui, Huabo Duan,

26. Danfeng Yu, Zhishi Wang. Towards

27. a sustainable energy efficient city: a case study

28. Macau // Renewable and sustainable energy

29. Reviews. 2017. Volume 75. pp. 504 – 514.

30. Ishi Liu. The Guastavino Dome Building in Chianna

31. : A Historical Overview

32. of the Tsinghua University Auditorium Dome // Borders

33. Architectural research. 2014. Volume Ii. 3. Problem 2.

34. pp. 121-140.

35. Vivian U.Y. Tam, Sepani Senaratne, Hoa N.

36. Le, Li-Yin Shen, Josip Perika, I.M. Cetana

37. S. Illankun. Cost analysis for the life cycle

38. of the introduction of "green" construction

39. using wood // Journal of Clean Production.

40. Volume 147. pp. 458-469.

41. Kuzyaeva N.A., Gorbunova V.S. Domes

42. constructions as a way to implement new ones

43. Analytical ideas // Perspectives of science

44. and education. 2014. No. 1(7). pp. 269-272.

45. Shirokov V.S., Alpatov V.Yu. Development of an

46. algorithm and software tool

47. for simplified geometry assignment

48. of a specific spherical dome cover

49. during its parametric optimization

50. using the software complexes

51. "Lira" and SCAD // Scientific electronic

52. archive. – Access mode: http://www.econf .

53. rae.ru/article/7098 .

54. (Date

55. /10/2017).

56. appeals

57. Prelov S.A. Construction of fast-

58. moving residential and social facilities in

59. within

60. the framework of the Noosphere Architecture concept under the LotosDom brand. – In: Authors of the II All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation

61.

62. "Energy and resource efficiency of low

63. -rise residential buildings". March 24-26

64. , 2015 – Novosibirsk: Institute of Thermophysics

65. SB RAS, 2015. pp. 42-49.

66. Airapetov D.P., Zavarikhin S.P.,

67. Makotinsky M.P. Plastics in architecture.

68. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1981– 190 p

69. . 14. Pavlov G., Suprun A.N. Geodesic

70. floors: design at the modern

71. level // CAD and graphics. 2006. № 3. - 34 -

72. Bulletin of the Siberian State Industrial University No. 2 (20), 2017

73. Poryvaev I.A., Safiullin M.N., Semenov

74. A.A. Investigation of wind and snow

75. loads on coatings

76. of vertical cylindrical reservoirs //

77. Civil Engineering magazine. 2012. No. 5. pp. 12-22.

78. Dale I. Yeats, Dana Oden, Christie

79. Cooksey, Chien-Fei Chen. A systematic

80. review of strategies for overcoming barriers

81. to the introduction of energy-efficient technologies in buildings //

82. Energy research and social sciences. 2017. In

83. print.

84. Amin Hagigi Postiri, Safura Bahar, Aza

85. Deh Jafari. Daily cooling of single-storey buildings

86. using a domed roof and a solar adsorption

87. cooling system // Applied power engineering. 2016. Volume.

88. pp. 299-319.

89. Rakhyong Kim, Seongho Tae, Seungjun Ro.

90. Developing a low-carbon durability project

91. for environmentally friendly apartment buildings in South Korea.

92. // Reviews on renewable and sustainable energy

93. . 2017. Volume 77. pp. 263-272

94. . 19. Zhonghua Gou, Xiaohuan Xie. The development

95. of green construction: a triple result or

96. regenerating design? // Journal of environmentally friendly production.

97. Volume 153. pp. 600 – 607.

98. Amos Darko, Albert Ping, Chen Chan, Ernest

99. Effa Ameyo, Bao-Tse He, Ayokunle

100. Olubunmi Olanipekun. Study of problems

101. related to the introduction

102. of green building technologies: perspectives of experts in the field of "green" construction in the United States

103. // Energy and Buildings.

104. Volume 144. pp. 320-332.


Review

For citations:


Popova Е., Baschenko N., Sorvachev A., Chuprina O. DOME SURFACE AS AN ENERGY EFFICIENCY ELEMENT ENCLOSING STRUCTURES. Bulletin of the Siberian State Industrial University. 2017;(2):30-35. (In Russ.)

Views: 69


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2304 - 4497 (Print)
ISSN 2307-1710 (Online)